[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”4.26.1″ _module_preset=”default” background_enable_color=”off” custom_padding=”2px||5px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” width=”80%” custom_padding=”||2px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n
Carbon capture from hard-to-abate industries is essential. This study investigates the effect of stripper pressure on the performance of amine-based CO2 capture from cement flue gas, using the CESAR1 solvent. Through a rigorous data filtering and binning methodology, experimental results were systematically categorized, enabling a precise evaluation of how stripper pressure and stripping intensity affect solvent regeneration, thermal efficiency, and subsequent energy demands. Additionally, a holistic analysis of operating with altered stripper pressure is presented, where downstream compression and solvent degradation are considered. Increasing stripper pressure consistently improves capture efficiency, reduces lean solvent loading, and increases the cyclic capacity, ultimately leading to lower specific reboiler duty.<\/p>\n
Higher stripper pressure also enhances lean-rich heat exchanger performance by improving temperature differentials. Operating at higher pressure reduces the water load on the overhead condenser, even at elevated temperatures. These conditions, in turn, mitigate overall cooling duties. Elevated stripper pressure decreases both reboiler duty and compression work. From our results, operating at higher pressures does not present downsides. However, degradation rates increase at elevated temperatures. We suggest that the standard operating pressure for capturing CO2 with the CESAR1 solvent be evaluated, as it provides an opportunity for reduced energy consumption while also monitoring solvent health over extended periods.<\/p>\n
Keywords<\/span>: CO2 capture, CESAR1, Advanced configurations, Pilot-scale<\/em><\/p>\n Authors<\/span>: Isaac Appelquist L\u00f8ge, Can Demir, Sai Hema Bhavya Vinjarapu, Randi Neerup, Ebbe Hauge Jensen, Jens Kristian J\u00f8rsboe, Maria Dimitriadi, Vanja Buvik, Halil Halilov, Carsten Fritzner Fr\u00f8strup, Istvan Gyorbiro, Nomiki Kottaki, Asams Nelliparambil Jayan, S\u00f8ren Jensen, Jakob Lindkvist Karlsson, Philip Loldrup Fosb\u00f8l.<\/em><\/p>\n [\/et_pb_text][et_pb_button button_url=”https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S1385894725047357″ url_new_window=”on” button_text=”Read full publication” _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” button_bg_color=”#63afb0″ button_border_radius=”43px” button_on_hover=”off” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” sticky_enabled=”0″][\/et_pb_button][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”4.24.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”0px||0px||true|” locked=”off” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.26.1″ _module_preset=”default” background_color=”#FFFFFF” width=”100%” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.24.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_post_nav prev_text=”Previous news” next_text=”Next news” _builder_version=”4.24.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_post_nav][dsm_blog_carousel include_categories=”6″ excerpt_length=”20″ use_author=”off” _builder_version=”4.24.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/dsm_blog_carousel][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Abstract Carbon capture from hard-to-abate industries is essential. This study investigates the effect of stripper pressure on the performance of amine-based CO2 capture from cement flue gas, using the CESAR1 solvent. Through a rigorous data filtering and binning methodology, experimental results were systematically categorized, enabling a precise evaluation of how stripper pressure and stripping intensity affect solvent regeneration, thermal efficiency, and subsequent energy demands. Additionally, a holistic analysis of operating with altered stripper pressure is presented, where downstream compression and solvent degradation are considered. Increasing stripper pressure consistently improves capture efficiency, reduces lean solvent loading, and increases the cyclic capacity, ultimately leading to lower specific reboiler duty. Higher stripper pressure also enhances lean-rich heat exchanger performance by improving temperature differentials. Operating at higher pressure reduces the water load on the overhead condenser, even at elevated temperatures. These conditions, in turn, mitigate overall cooling duties. Elevated stripper pressure decreases both reboiler duty and compression work. From our results, operating at higher pressures does not present downsides. However, degradation rates increase at elevated temperatures. We suggest that the standard operating pressure for capturing CO2 with the CESAR1 solvent be evaluated, as it provides an opportunity for reduced energy consumption while also monitoring […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":6989,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"on","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6988","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-journal-publication"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/aurora-heu.eu\/el\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6988","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/aurora-heu.eu\/el\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/aurora-heu.eu\/el\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aurora-heu.eu\/el\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aurora-heu.eu\/el\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6988"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/aurora-heu.eu\/el\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6988\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6993,"href":"https:\/\/aurora-heu.eu\/el\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6988\/revisions\/6993"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aurora-heu.eu\/el\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6989"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/aurora-heu.eu\/el\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6988"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aurora-heu.eu\/el\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6988"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aurora-heu.eu\/el\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6988"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}