CO2 capture technology is vital for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. But what happens when the chemicals used in this process wear out or degrade? Scientists have been studying how to rejuvenate these chemicals through a method called thermal reclaiming. This research focuses on ethanolamine (MEA), a widely used solvent for capturing CO2, to understand how to improve its reuse and reduce waste.

Thermal reclaiming is like giving old solvents a makeover. Over time, the chemicals used in CO2 capture degrade due to heat, impurities, and chemical reactions. These changes can make them less effective. Thermal reclaiming heats the degraded solvent under controlled conditions to remove harmful byproducts and recover usable chemicals. 

Why Focus on Ethanolamine (MEA)?

Ethanolamine (MEA) is one of the most common solvents for CO capture due to its effectiveness and relatively low cost. However, it is prone to degradation, resulting in the formation of numerous byproducts. Researchers selected MEA for this study to gain a deeper understanding of its behavior under reclaiming conditions and to explore methods for its efficient reuse. This work not only advances knowledge about MEA but also lays the groundwork for designing methodologies to test other solvents, as will be undertaken with CESAR1 in AURORA this year, building on the foundation established in this study. 

How Does Degradation Affect the Process?

Degradation makes the MEA solvent less effective at capturing CO and introduces impurities that can harm equipment and increase costs. These byproducts fall into three categories:

  • Heat Stable Salts (HSS): Non-volatile compounds that stay in the sludge.
  • Volatile Compounds: Substances like ammonia and small aldehydes that may escape into the air.
  • Complex Degradation Products: Compounds that are harder to remove and may affect the solvent’s performance.

What Did the Scientists Do?

The researchers tested thermal reclaiming on both fresh and degraded MEA under various conditions of temperature and pressure. They used sophisticated tools to analyze the reclaimed solvent and the leftover sludge. They also conducted simpler lab tests to simulate how different chemicals behave during the process.

Key Findings

  • Efficiency of Reclaiming: Fresh MEA was easier to clean and recover compared to degraded MEA.
  • Byproduct Behavior: Some harmful byproducts, like certain amides, were reduced during the process. However, new byproducts also formed, highlighting the need to optimize conditions.
  • Alkaline Hydrolysis: Adding a strong base helped break down some stubborn compounds, but this method was more effective in lab tests than in real reclaiming scenarios.
  • Environmental Concerns: Some volatile byproducts, like secondary amines, may escape during reclaiming. These compounds could form harmful substances like nitrosamines, emphasizing the need for strict emission controls.

Why Does This Matter?

Improving the efficiency of thermal reclaiming means less waste, lower costs, and better environmental outcomes. It also ensures that CO2 capture remains a viable tool in the fight against climate change.

The Authors

  • SINTEF Industry, NO-7465 Trondheim, Norway: Vanja Buvik, Andreas Grimstvedt, Kai Vernstad, Merete Wiig;
  • Department of Chemical Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), N-7497- Trondheim, Norway: Hanna K. Knuutila;
  • Aker Carbon Capture: Ricardo Wanderley.

Conclusion

Thermal reclaiming is a promising way to recycle the chemicals used in CO2 capture. While challenges remain, studies like this one provide valuable insights into making the process more effective and sustainable. As we continue to refine these methods, we get closer to a cleaner and greener future.